|
April 23, 2005
Senate
Asbestos Effort Draws Praise
from Both Sides after Panel Backs Bill
Tort reform advocates appear to have cleared
the last major hurdle in the push for asbestos litigation
reform with a compromise plan that cleared Senate State
Affairs Committee on Friday.
The panel voted 8-0 for Senate Bill 15 by
State Senator Kyle Janek after trial lawyers
and consumer groups dropped their opposition and reached
a mutual agreement with business interests on legislation
that failed in the upper chamber two years ago. The legislation
seeks to curb asbestos and silica claims by plaintiffs who
show no signs of actual impairment while preserving the
right of workers who've been exposed to sue for damages
once they are ill. Supporters say asbestos and silica litigation
limitations are needed to help keep suits with merit from
backing up in civil courts that have been clogged with cases
involving workers who aren't really sick.
Despite suggesting that the status quo would
be better, Alex Winslow, the executive
director of Texas Watch, echoed the sentiments of longtime
adversaries in praising Lieutenant Governor David
Dewhurst, State Affairs Chairman Robert
Duncan and Janek for "conducting a fair process"
that culminated in the deal. Winslow said the committee's
compromise proposal "softens many of the sharp edges"
in the original Janek bill. “Considering the influence
of the insurance industry at the Capitol, the current compromise
may be the best result for victims and their families,"
Winslow added.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform President Richard
Trabulsi Jr. agreed that Dewhurst, Janek and State
Affairs Chairman Robert Duncan deserved
high marks for the "time, talent and dedication"
they invested in their work on the asbestos litigation measure.
Trabulsi predicted that the Senate would eventually approve
a bill that will become a model in the effort to crack down
on asbestos lawsuit abuses. He said the asbestos legislation
should be aimed at ensuring that "legitimate claimants
are justly compensated, that the integrity of our civil
justice is restored, and that thousands of jobs are preserved."
The move to restrict asbestos litigation in
Texas stalled in the Senate in 2003 when a couple of Republicans
joined forces with Democrats to block floor debate on the
issue. State Senator Eddie Lucio Jr., a
Brownsville Democrat who drew the wrath of Governor Rick
Perry that year after reversing his field and siding
with the opposition, cast a vote in favor of the compromise
proposal in committee this time around.
The concerted attempt by both sides to negotiate
a middle ground came in sharp contrast to the bitter war
of words and partisan tension that marked the debate two
years ago when the House took the lead on medical malpractice
liability and other tort reform proposals. House Republicans
that year had the votes to pass a constitutional amendment
that came to be known as Proposition 12 without the need
for significant tradeoffs and concessions. Democrats on
the same side as trial lawyers were repeatedly turned back
in attempts to modify the legislation in a debate that helped
set the stage for partisan warfare throughout the rest of
the regular session 2003 and three special sessions on congressional
redistricting that year.
The lead Proposition 12 sponsor - Republican
State Rep. Joe Nixon of Houston - will
carry the asbestos bill after it wins Senate approval and
moves to the House. State Senator Jane Nelson
- the Senate sponsor of Prop. 12 - is a co-sponsor on SB
15.
|