|
October 11, 2004
Republican Campbell Denies Spa Incident
while Dems Go on Offense in Close Races
By
Mike Hailey
Capitol
Inside Editor
Democrats went on the offensive Monday in two of the state's
tighest Texas House races while a Republican incumbent came
out swinging against charges that have left his campaign
teetering on the brink of self-destruction during the past
few days.
In an interview with a hometown television station, State
Rep. Scott Campbell of San Angelo denied
a claim by a local masseuse who had accused him of indecent
exposure after an alleged visit to a day spa where she worked
in May. The allegation was published late last week by the
San Angelo Standard Times after the newspaper obtained
an offense report that had been on file at the city's police
department. Despite making the potentially career-ending
accusation, Campbell's accuser has declined to press formal
charges. She is no longer an employed at the spa, according
to news reports.
Campbell reacted angrily to the furor in a weekend interview
with the Snyder Daily News, calling the allegation
"hogwash" and suggesting that he had been a victim
of character defamation at the hands of his hometown newspaper.
The indecent exposure accusation came to light within days
after the newspaper reported that the first-term lawmaker
had been charged by the Texas Department of Public Safety
in a preliminary complaint of driving while intoxicated stemming
from an incident in July. While returning to San Angelo from
a speaking engagement in Kerrville, Campbell pulled over and
was parked on the side of the road during the middle of the
afternoon. A DPS who went to check on the lawmaker reported
that the lawmaker's speech was slurred and he appeared off
balance. But Campbell apparently was not asked to take a field
sobriety, blood alcohol, urine or breath tests at the time
of the alleged offense. Campbell now denies that he was drunk
at the time, although he has acknowledged that he had consumed
a minor amount of alcohol that day. Campbell had gone to Kerrville
for the Texas Sheep and Goat Raisers Association convention.
According to an association official quoted by the Snyder
newspaper, the lawmaker did not complete his speech to the
group before leaving the podium. Campbell says he pulled over
on the way back to San Angelo because he felt ill. He told
the local paper that he checked himself into an alcohol rehabilitation
program for 28 days following the incident involving the DPS.
The DWI was filed in Concho County, where the legislator's
brother, Bill Campbell, is the county attorney.
The Snyder newspaper reported that the local prosecutor
will recuse himself and turn the case
over to a special prosecutor. The state lawmaker, who was
elected to the House District 72 seat after former Democratic
Rep. Rob Junell decided against a re-election
bid two years ago, was charged with DWI 10 years ago while
running for Congress, according to the Snyder paper.
The sudden rash of publicity has threatened to derail what
for months appeared to be a relatively easy re-election
effort for Campbell in a district with twice as many Republicans
as Democrats. While Campbell has vowed not to resign the
seat, the reports about his personal life have opened the
door for Democratic challenge Jeri Slone,
who had been running television advertisements for several
days before the stories about the Republican began to circulate
in the four-county House district. The HD 72 contest is
a rematch of the 2002 campaign, which ended with Campbell
defeating Slone with more than 68 percent of the general
election vote. Despite the loss two years ago, the challenger
reported raising slightly more than $8,000 for her campaign
during the past three months to go with almost $10,000 in
loans to her campaign this year. Campbell raised less than
$6,000 during that time.
Mabry Says Doc Getting
Corporate Help
In Waco, State Rep. John Mabry of Waco
accused Republican challenger Charles "Doc"
Anderson of systematically violating the state's
law banning corporate campaign contributions first entering
the House District 56 competition more than two years ago.
Attempting to repeat the longshot victory that he claimed
in a Republican district two years ago, Mabry charged that
Anderson has taken 21 illegal corporate donations since
2001 including four that he accepted during the general
election phase of this year's campaign.
The Democratic incumbent said Anderson accepted illegal
corporate contributions when he had thousands of flyers,
stationery and other campaign materials furnished by a Waco
printing firm. Mabry also pointed to a $1,000 contribution
that Anderson received from the Princess Three Corp. in
Henderson earlier this year before returning in July after
the McLennan County Democratic Party chairman filed a complaint
with the Texas Ethics Commission. Anderson, who defeated
two primary opponents en route to the Republican nomination
in HD 56, dismissed the Princess Three contribution as an
inadvertent mistake after it was spotted and publicized
by Mabry.
Mabry's accusations came three weeks after a Travis County
grand jury indicted three Republican operatives and several
corporations on charges involving allegedly illegal corporate
contributions in the 2002 state House races. Two of the
consultants were also charged with laundering corporate
money to GOP House candidates through the Republican National
Committee during the elections two years ago.
Democrat Says Tuition
Vote Anti-Middle Class
To the south in San Antonio, Democratic challenger David
Leibowitz portrayed State Rep. Ken Mercer
as anti-middle class as a result of a 2003 vote to allow
public colleges and univerities to raise tuition without
legislative approval.
Leibowitz, who has spent considerable sums of his own money
in an attempt to wrestle HD 117 back into the Democrats'
column, said that public college tuition has soared 32 percent
since Mercer backed House Republican leaders' call for tuition
deregulation last year. The Democatic challenger says the
higher cost of college is tantamount to a tax hike on middle-income
Texans who plan to send their children to college in the
state.
Democrats appears to have a lock on the San Antonio district
until their nominee for the seat was indicted shortly before
the election in 2002. Mercer, who had been considered a
longshot, won on what appeared to be a protest vote against
the embattled Democratic candidate in the race that year.
The reverse took place in HD 56 in Waco as Mabry pulled
off a major upset against a Republican who held the seat
briefly before his campaign came unglued amid a series of
gaffes in 2002. Thanks to the inherent advantages of incumbency,
Mercer and Mabry are considered to have 50-50 shots at re-election
this year.
|