|
September 21, 2004
Grand Jury Might Serve Up Indictments
Today in 2002 Campaign Finance Probe
|
Grand
Jury Indicts TRMPAC Officials, Corporations in 2002
State Elections Probe
The grand jury investigating the 2002 state House
elections has issued a 32-count indictment charging
two key officials for the Texans for a Republican
Majority, a Washington D.C.-based fundraiser
and between eight and 10 corporations, according to
courthouse sources.
Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle
is expected to comment on the latest developments
at a 2 p.m. news conference today at the county criminal
courts building.
The grand jury indicted Austin consultant John
Colyandro and Warren Robold,
a key fundraiser for the Americans for a Republican
Majority. More indictments could be forthcoming.
More to come ... |
The Texas political world is bracing for a possible announcement
today of indictments in connection with the Travis County
grand jury investigation into the flow of corporate money
into the 2002 state House elections.
There was intense speculation Monday in both Republican
and Democrat political circles that grand jurors will vote
to issue formal charges against multiple defendants before
the panel's term expires today. The current grand jury is
the third that has been impaneled to probe the possibility
that corporate money was used illegally to influence the
outcome of races that swept Republicans into control of
the Texas House for the first time in more than 130 years.
Such an announcement with only six weeks remaining before
the November 2 general election would leave Travis County
District Attorney Ronnie Earle exposed
to a fusillade of criticism over the timing and motivation
of a case that he's been pursuing since the GOP seized control
of the Texas House in January 2003.
In the event of indictments, Republicans who have questioned
Earle's motives every step of the way will argue that a
decision to bring official charges this close to the election
confirms their longrunning suspicion that political considerations
have fueled the ongoing inquiry since its inception. Earle,
a Democrat who represented Austin in the Texas House in
the 1970s, has contended previously that the investigation
has been delayed by GOP stalling tactics such as an extensive
open records requests filed last year by Republican lawyer
Andy Taylor.
Taylor has represented the Texas Association of
Business, the powerful trade association that was
the initial target of the inquiry early last year. The probe
has also focused on the Texans for a Republican
Majority, a political action committee founded
by U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay.
Earlier this year the Sugar Land Republican reportedly began
preparing for the possibility that he might have to temporarily
step aside if indicted in connection with the campaign finance
investigation. DeLay has vehemently denied any wrongdoing
- and lawyers and others close to the case were predicting
Monday that the powerful Texas Republican leader will not
be charged if the grand jury takes action today. There was
also a sense among insiders on Monday that the grand jury
will not hand up any indictments against TAB officials or
Texas House Speaker Tom Craddick, who had
drawn attention from prosecutors for activities involving
his race for the chamber's top job two years ago.
Earle's office began its inquiry after learning of a direct
mail campaign that the state's largest business organization
had waged in almost two dozen House districts that were
the scene of competitive battles between Republican and
Democratic candidates that year. TAB officials contend the
group was engaged in issue advocacy that's permitted by
election law - and they have cited their First Amendment
rights in refusing to disclose the source of the association's
funding for the mail campaign.
Most of the speculation on possible indictments centered
on TRMPAC, despite predictions that DeLay himself would
not be charged. Even if the grand jury decides to issue
indictments, there's speculation at the Capitol that it
will be difficult for prosecutors to obtain any convictions
in connection with the ongoing case due to the vast amounts
of gray area in which the various activities under scrutiny
took place. Republicans have contended throughout the inquiry
that they did nothing different than Democrats did when
they were trying to hold on to their majority in the Legislature.
|