June 7, 2007
Governor Signs Film Incentives Measure
Despite Industry Warnings on Censorship
By
Mike Hailey
Capitol
Inside Editor
With Texas-bred actor Dennis Quaid at
his side, Governor Rick Perry
on Thursday signed a film incentives bill despite
warnings from the motion picture industry that
the measure is patently unconstitutional and ripe
for a court challenge.
The legislation strengthens a film incentives
program that was created two years ago as a way
to attract movie and television production to
Texas at a time when projects have been going
increasingly to neighboring states with more competitive
incentive plans. A related state budget rider
allocates $22 million for the program for the
next two years but allows more than that amount
to be used for incentives if approved by the Legislature
Budget Board and the governor's office. Perry
said the measure will bring jobs to the state
while providing an economic boost to cities where
new films and TV programs are made.
But Perry signed House Bill 1634 into law against
the advice of the Motion Picture Association of
America, which urged the governor to veto the
measure in a letter that was sent to his office
three days after the regular session came to an
end last week.
The industry trade organization that represents
major producers and distributors said the measure
was an infringement on First Amendment rights
and would discourage filmmakers from shooting
in Texas because the state will have the right
to review and approve scripts.
"This provision is a direct indictment of
the creative process and American values of free
expression that are fundamental to our democracy,"
Vans Stevenson, the MPAA's senior
vice president for state government affairs, said
in the letter to Perry. "Motion pictures
made in the United States are the most popular
form of entertainment worldwide because filmmakers
are free to tell stories on film without fear
of government censorship."
Stevenson asserted that the legislation is subject
to "immediate constitutional challenge"
in a federal court - and he warned that court
rulings on such grounds had cost taxpayers an
average of $1 million for each case in which plaintiffs
in a lawsuit prevailed.
Authored by State Rep. Dawnna Dukes,
an Austin Democrat, the film incentives measure
did not contain the language in question when
it was approved by the House in April. But the
Senate sponsor, Republican State Senator Bob
Deuell of Greenville, agreed to include
the provision after presenting the bill to the
Finance Committee and determining that it would
not pass without it. State Senator Steve
Ogden, a Bryan Republican who chairs
the Senate Finance Committee, wanted the language
that has sparked the MPAA's protests incorporated
into the measure before it left the upper chamber.
Deuell's office was unaware of the MPAA's warnings
and said the industry organization hadn't mentioned
any potential problems with the censorship provision
during discussions on the bill before it was approved
and sent to Perry.
The new law prohibits incentive funding for productions
that are deemed to be obscene - and it gives state
officials the right to reject applications for
incentive grants if they determine that a project
will have "inappropriate content or content
that portrays Texas or Texans in a negative fashion."
The legislation also requires state officials
to weigh "general standards of decency and
respect for the diverse beliefs and values of
the citizens of Texas" before deciding whether
to approve incentive funding for the production
of a movie or TV show here.
Dukes, who chairs the Appropriations Special
Issues Subcommittee, said the provisions were
added to the legislation to avoid a dispute like
the one that occured in North Carolina last year
after a Dakota Fanning movie
that includes a controversial rape scene was filmed
there. The furor over the Fanning film Hounddog
sparked a debate among North Carolina legislators
on whether to move swiftly with legislation that
would prevent the producers who made the movie
from qualifying for filmmaking incentives from
the state.
During the negotiations in Austin this year,
Deuell was reportedly upset about a scene in the
movie Glory Road that shows African-Americans
on Texas Western University's NCAA championship
basketball team as targets of racism while in
the East Texas city of Commerce for a game there
in the late 1960s. Commerce is in Deuell's district.
The MPAA is represented at the Capitol by lobbyists
from the Akin Gump law firm including Jody
Richardson, a former television news
anchor and reporter who has experience in the
production of films and documentaries. Austin
lobbyist Gaylord Armstrong and
other members of the law firm McGinnis Lochridge
& Kilgore were actively involved in the negotiations
on the film incentives bill as well. HillCo's
Brandon Aghamalian and Lawrence
Collins worked on the bill as lobbyists
for the Texas Motion Picture Alliance. Perry's
budget director, Mike Morrissey,
was also instrumental in the development of the
legislation.
Some of the bill's advocates were concerned that
the censorship language could be problematical
from a legal standpoint, but they feared that
Ogden could become an obstacle to the funding
on which the measure revolves as the Senate's
chief budget writer. Lobbyists involved in the
push for HB 1634 initially thought that State
Senator John Carona, a Dallas
Republican who'd sponsored related legislation
in 2005, would carry the incentives bill in the
Senate this year. But Deuell was well-versed in
the general subject matter as the Senate sponsor
of the Texas Commission on the Arts sunset bill
- and Perry's office wanted him to take charge
on the film incentives plan as a result as well.
The new law takes effect immediately as a result
of a unanimous vote in the Senate and an overwhelming
show of support in the House as well. Republican
State Rep. Charlie Howard of
Sugar Land cast the only vote against the measure
when the House agreed to accept the Senate amendment
a week before the regular session adjourned. Republican
State Reps. Jimmie Don Aycock of
Killeen and Robert Talton of
Pasadena had voted against HB 1634 when it had
been approved initially in the lower chamber almost
two months ago. But Aycock and Talton voted for
the measure after the Senate had amended it.
|