|
April 26, 2005
Workers'
Compensation Negotiations
Could Be Back on Track Next Week
By
Mike Hailey
Capitol
Inside Editor
Behind-the-scenes movement on the west side
of the Texas Capitol suggests that reports of a standoff
on workers' compensation might be premature and that a middle-ground
plan could begin to materialize before the end of next week.
Up to this point the key House and Senate
players haven't been able to agree on the bill to use as
the main vehicle for workers comp legislation - much less
on how to bridge substantial differences between the two
approaches each chamber has taken on the highly-complex
issue. But State Rep. Burt Solomons, the
House sponsor, is reviewing concepts that his Senate counterpart,
Republican State Senator Todd Staples of
Palestine, has suggested as a way to try to get the process
on track for a compromise bill. Solomons, a Carrollton Republican,
has indicated that he's not going to be rushed into negotiations
on a final product. But Solomons says that he's working
behind the scenes to try to find an approach that both sides
can accept and that he's hopeful that a viable workers compensation
plan will be in the works by the first week in May.
While Solomons and Staples are cast opposite
each other as sponsors, lobbyists with a stake in the workers'
compensation debate suggest that they have been ordered
to the sidelines while the issue is resolved not by the
bills' authors but by Lieutenant Governor David
Dewhurst and Speaker Tom Craddick.
The Legislature's top two Republican leaders, however, haven't
appeared to budge in the past month since the House passed
its workers' compensation plan in Sunset legislation instead
of considering a bill that senators approved two weeks earlier
on the heels of an interim committee study. The apparent
lack of progress from a public perspective has inspired
news reports and editorials that give the impression of
an impasse between Craddick and Solomons on one side and
Dewhurst and Staples on the other as both sides wait to
see who will blink first in a territorial test of wills,
egos and allegiances to plans that offer two distinct avenues
to workers compensation reform.
But some players involved in the debate think
there's a good chance that a deal will gell in time to beat
the buzzer because both sides have separate if not equally
compelling motivations to agree to an overhaul of the workers
comp system.
Craddick has reportedly told interested parties
that he considers workers' compensation reform to be a huge
priority for the regular session that ends May 30. Some
senators and east wing staff see workers comp as the second
biggest priority this year next to public school finance.
Employers in general favor meaningful reform
for a system that's been plauged by soaring premiums and
a poor track record when it comes to getting injured workers
back on the job. Doctors and other medical professionals
have argued that the legislation should ensure that workers
who are injured have access to quality care and treatment
and that health care providers are paid promptly for their
services. Chiropractors so far are the only interest group
to oppose either plan at the committee level.
The Senate bill would shrink the Texas Workers'
Compensation Commission from a six-member part-time board
to a single full-time commissioner who would be in charge
of a Department of Workers' Compensation. But the House
voted to do away with the TWCC and shift its functions to
the Texas Department of Insurance. Both bills would allow
companies to form health care networks with doctors who
would treat injured workers. But the House legislation would
make it easier for doctors to get into the system.
The political futures of several of the key
players in the workers' comp debate could be affected by
the success or failure on the issue this year. Staples is
widely viewed as a probable candidate for agriculture commissioner
in 2006 - and there's some speculation that Solomons might
be interested in a state Senate race if the seat in the
district where he lives open up in the near future. Dewhurst
is believed to be interested in a race for either U.S. Senate
or governor in the next few years.
There's some speculation that Dewhurst might
think that he has something to prove amid perceptions that
Craddick came out ahead when the House and Senate leaders
clashed on issues during their first session in those particular
roles two years ago. Craddick's reputation as a hard-nosed
negotiator is well documented - but both sides appear to
have strong incentives to see that a deal is reached before
the clock runs out on them next month.
|