November 9, 2006
Missed
Opportunity
Democrats
Who Gained House Seats Picked Wrong
Time to Not Have a Strong Statewide Ticket in Place
By
MIKE HAILEY
The strategy seemed reasonably pragmatic - concentrate
on Texas House races and a couple of congressional contests
that appeared to be winnable then regroup with a strong
cast for a statewide ticket four years from now when
there's an opening at the Governor's Mansion. While
Democrats in Texas had Tom DeLay to kick around, who
would have known two years ago how much public opinion
on Iraq would shift, how big scandals in Washington
and other ports would grow and how a Florida congressman
would fan the flames with flirtatious emails to pages?
There was no way to understand then exactly why 2006
would turn out to be a bad year for Democrats to not
have a strong statewide ticket in place.
From the half-full glass perspective, the Democrats'
game plan was a success as their candidates unseated
Republican state House incumbents in Dallas, Arlington,
Houston and Corpus Christi while claiming an open Austin
seat that the GOP has controlled for the past 16 years.
The Democrats also kept Republicans at bay in a West
Texas district that was supposed to be a slam-dunk once
Pete Laney decided to step down. Nick Lampson exacted
revenge by seizing the congressional seat that redistricting
mastermind Tom DeLay held until he dropped out of the
U.S. House under a cloud of criminal charges and folded
his re-election campaign when it was too late for the
GOP to replace him on the ballot.
On paper, Democrats who care about more than just the
governor's race were big winners in the general election
this week with impressive victories by State Reps.-elect
Ellen Cohen, Juan Garcia, Paula Hightower-Pierson and
Allen Vaught in battles with Republican incumbents and
hard-fought wins by Valinda Bolton, Joe Heflin and Joe
Farias in races for open House seats. With help from
the king of Republican contributors - Houston home builder
Bob Perry - a handful of rural House Democrats who have
their own political action committee were re-elected
by wider margins than they were in 2004. State Rep.
Robby Cook was the only one of the self-styled WD-40s
who had to sweat it on the election night when Republican
Tim Kleinschmidt came close after running a superior
campaign.
There was cause for celebration Tuesday night wherever
you found folks from the House Democratic Caucus, Annie's
List, the Texas 2020 PAC, the Texas Parent PAC, the
League of Conservation Voters, the Texans for Insurance
Reform and the offices of trial lawyers like Fred Baron
and Mikal Watts.
Lampson basked in the headlines glow in the wake of
a victory over Republican write-in candidate Shelley
Sekula Gibbs, who will keep the Congressional District
22 seat warm for him for a couple of months until his
two-year term begins as a result of her consolation
victory in a special election that the Democrat chose
to skip for reasons that might make sense to him. Lampson
didn't just win a race for Congress. He gave new meaning
to the term payback in winning the seat that had been
held by the Republican who'd engineered a redistricting
process that all but guaranteed Lampson's defeat two
years ago.
While Lampson commanded the spotlight on a night when
Democrats were taking back the U.S. House after a dozen
years of Republican rule, another former Texas congressman
had plenty to cheer about two years after losing a re-election
bid on the new map that DeLay and the GOP had drawn
to ensure his defeat. The election this week showed
that Martin Frost's machine - while not as finely tuned
and primed as it used to be when he led the DCCC and
the House Democratic Caucus - was still capable of springing
into action with the victories that Hightower-Pierson
and Vaught achieved over Republican State Reps. Toby
Goodman of Arlington and Bill Keffer of Dallas. The
Democratic challengers' campaigns attempted to play
down ties to Frost and the organization he'd put together
over a long career in Congress - but from the outside
it appeared that Frost associates had recruited the
pair of challengers who beat incumbents in areas that
he used to represent and had significant influence and
input in their campaigns. Democrats who worked for Frost
are running groups that are funded primarily if not
exclusively by Baron and used as conduits for funds
that eventually end up with the Texas Democratic Party,
the HDCC or opposition research efforts.
Frost and Laney had more sway than anyone over Democratic
Party operations in Texas when Democrats had majorities
in the Texas House and the congressional delegation.
While the DFW campaigns that Democrats won played out
in Frost's long shadow, Laney proved to be a one-man
wrecking crew to hopes that Republicans have harbored
about taking over the seat when he was no longer on
the ballot to defend it. The former House speaker reaffirmed
the adage that all politics are local - at least they
are in his stomping grounds - and he showed GOP prognosticators
and other Austin pundits that he knows a lot more about
the district he's represented for more than three decades
than they do while he worked hard to get Heflin elected
in his place.
On the Texas House battleground, Democrats won big
this week. That's one way to look at it. But for all
the gains that they achieved on the national and local
levels and in the state House, the argument can also
be made that Democrats might have been among the biggest
losers in this year's election as a result of the golden
opportunities they missed.
The "what could have been" speculation is
a reflection of a debate that's been waging among Texas
Democrats on whether the party should always field the
best candidates it can find for races up and down the
ballot or selectively pick and choose where to focus
resources and where to avoid wasting them. The Democratic
powers that be - another way of saying the lawyers who
put up most of the money and the party officials and
leaders who spent it - had put forth a statewide ticket
that received national acclaim before it was crushed
amid the reality of how red Texas really is. There'd
been a Bush on the ballot in the Oval Office or the
governor's job in every major election since 1988 -
and in a state that had been undergoing a natural evolution
into a two-party state with a fairly equal mix of Democrats
and Republican voters - the Bush presence had been impossible
to overcome.
None of the Democrats' strongest potential candidates
were stepping up and offering to be sacrifices in what
appeared to be another bad year shaping up. None realized
in 2004 or 2005 that a perfect storm was brewing and
headed for ultimate landfall by November 2006 - and
when it hit - the Democrats were not in position with
a viable statewide ticket to ride the tidal wave that
carried Democrats into control of the U.S. House and
Senate and other offices across the land. Barbara Radnofsky
ran a credible U.S. Senate campaign for someone who
had zero name identification and only a fraction of
the cash that Republican U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison
had. Chris Bell was out on his own in the governor's
race and way too far behind to have a chance to catch
up to Perry by the time he got his hands on some real
cash.
And Bell and Radnofsky were by far and away the Democrats'
top two statewide candidates in 2006 - with the exception
of State District Judge Bill Moody - who came a lot
closer in a state Supreme Court race than other Democratic
statewide nominees did in bids for other statewide posts.
It would be inaccurate to say that the Democrats' statewide
ticket was a joke because it wasn't funny. It was more
of an embarrassment - not because the people who ran
weren't capable of being good leaders - but because
they had no money, no name recognition, no organized
infrastructure for support, no grassroots enthusiasm
or any of the other ingredients for successful campaigns
beyond worthy intentions and a filing fee.
There was no coordinated statewide effort by Democrats
at a time when they could have used it to turn their
fortunes around after a drought that's gone on for a
decade. They didn't think they could compete on a statewide
level with Republicans this year without some good luck
- and they weren't in position to get lucky when the
tidal wave came though. Republicans who beat state candidates
who were unknown and broke are breathing collective
sighs of relief as a result. The GOP won all the statewide
races because it had a real ticket in place for the
election. It has every year in memory - log before its
candidates started winning. Democrats can only wonder
what might have happened if they'd done the same.
Mike Hailey's column appears
regularly in Capitol Inside |